Porto AG, Zappulla P, Sgarito G, Conti S. High-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: There is still a country for “old men”. World J Cardiol 2026; 18(7): 120973 [DOI: 10.4330/wjc.120973]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
The review process was outstanding. Everything was smooth and clear from submission to publication. The reviewers provided thoughtful, constructive, and insightful feedback that significantly improved the overall quality of the paper. Their comments were detailed, fair, and instrumental in strengthening both the presentation and the scientific content of the manuscript. Additionally, the editorial team was consistently supportive, prompt, and helpful throughout the entire process. Their professionalism, clear communication, and efficient handling of each stage made the publication experience both seamless and highly positive. I truly appreciate the dedication of everyone involved and would be pleased to submit future work to this journal.